Search This Blog

Showing posts with label cognitive psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cognitive psychology. Show all posts

Monday, May 30, 2011

Philosopher Daniel Dennet is a Loser

Loser Philosopher Daniel Dennet


Daniel Dennet is a loser as a philosopher. Dennet is a knee jerk athiest at a time when there are objectively valid proofs for God's Existence in circulation. You can prove God's Existence with logic alone by simply making the reasonble assumptions, by definition, that, by definition, God is Good, if God Exists, and that The Good is Postitive. You can also prove God's Existence using Logical Positivism, starting with the sense experience of observing billiard balls hitting each other on a billard table. Also, the best theory of Evolution states that meaning is involved in the process, not just randomness. This is confirmed by the work of Henri Bergson and Rupert Sheldrake. Also, you can prove the universal validity of logic starting with a simple self experiment where you hold an Apple in your left hand, and then not. Finally, Quantum Physics proves that there is metaphysical reality beyond the mundane material universe, and that that this reality involves meaning.



(C)Perpetual Copyright (2011) by Anthony J. Fejfar and Anthony J. Faber and

Neothomism, P.C. (PA)

Friday, October 8, 2010

Sense Experience and Science

Some scientists, and logical positivists, claim wrongly, that reality is best known by simply starting with sense experience and working from there. In fact, sense experience is homeostatic. That is, to some degree, sense experience is affected by the environment in which it operates. Thus, a person's hand feels cold when it is place in tepid water after having been placed in a bucket of hot water. Similarly, a person coming out of a dark room into sunlight will have to adjust his or her vision in a way that would not happen if the person had entered a dimly lit room. The taste of some food tastes different when another food is eaten first, such as a food which is either sweet or sour. Also, with respect to hearing, it is clear that human hearing does not cover the full range of sound that is being produced in the outside environment. Thus, a dog can hear a dog whistle, but a human being cannot. Finally, there are optical illusions which can only be explained throught the use of human understanding, such as, why it is that a straight dowel looks crooked when place in a glass tank of water, and then is observed from the side of the tank.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Kant and Hermeneutics

The idea that there is a Neumenal World and a Phenomenal World is attributed to the Philospher, Emmanuel Kant. Kant wrote that the phenomenal world is the world of sense experience, while the neumenal world is the world of ideas. Kant tells us that we can only really know the neumenal world of ideas, because, starting very early in childhood, human beings only really have sense experience which is interprested and constructed in light of ideas, or, meaning categories. Thus, Kant says that we never really know the phenomenal world of sense experience, as such. Philosopher, Bernard Lonergan says the same thing when he asserts that at Level 2 Consciousness, we only know the World Mediated by Meaning. Do we have any connection at all, then, with the material world of sense experience, which the empiricists claim that exists. Well, the Philosopher, Han Georg Gadamer tells us that us that there are "forestructures on knowing" which are in the human mind, prior to cogntition. Gadamer's position is a type of Neo-platonism, where he asserts that there are essentially, "Interpretive Forms" front loaded into the mind, just as Neo-platonists assert that there are "Immutable Platonic Forms" which are front loaded into the human mind, prior to cognition. However, there is yet another approach which asserts that we can know the real of the "world out there," which is Lonergan, stating that we know the world, or the real, through the cognitive process, of, experience, understanding, and then, judgment and reflection. Now, it is apparent that the cognitive level and operation of judgement and reflection involves a cognitive, intuitive function, not just ideal, analytic understanding. This is consistent with cogntive and epistemological, phenomenological reasearch which states the intuition involves high speed, preconscious or unconscious analogical thought processes in the mind, which can go quantum, and thus non-local at a distance, so that the person can have an immediate intuitive sympathy (Bergson) with an object or an idea which is out there is the physical world, and or, the historical world of the past.